On July the 16th, I gave a keynote talk at the GECCO 2017 workshop “Evolving Collective Behaviors in Robotics, organised by Nicolas Bredeche (UPMC), Evert Haasdijk (VUA), Heiko Hamann (U. Paderborn), Abraham Prieto (U. Coruña). (more…)
Two papers recently appeared, on PLOS ONE and on Robotics and Autonomous Systems.
The first one is about a study on decentralised decision making in multi-agent systems. The study has been conducted in collaboration with Andreagiovanni Reina, Gabriele Valentini, Cristian Fernandéz Oto and Marco Dorigo. It propose a design pattern for the design of collective decisions in multi-agent systems, and provides a link between the (macroscopic) dynamics of the system as-a-whole, and the rules determining the (microscopic) individual behaviour of each agent in the system.
The short story: PLoS ONE just published our new paper Advantages of Task-Specific Multi-Objective Optimisation in Evolutionary Robotics, in collaboration with Manuel López-Ibáñez. The paper discusses known benefits of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms in the context of the evolutionary robotics domain, and is supported by novel experimental results exploiting three benchmarking problems.
The long story: this has been the most painful publications of my career to date, under many aspects. On the one hand, this was a side-project with respect to my other activities, and I could dedicate to this only a very little part of my time. As a matter of fact, I started with the experiments back in June 2011 and finished only on April 2013. Nearly two years in which I could work on this only few hours a week, but I insisted as the I believed (and still do) that the subject is very relevant for the ER community.
On the other hand, this has been a prototypical example of how peer-review should not work: I experienced extremely long delays, subjective judgments, unprofessional behaviour. As a matter of fact, more than two years went past since the first submission. Here’s the detailed chronology: